Covid-19

No, Covid-19 ‘vaccinations’ have not protected against death

by

Covid-19 ‘vaccinations’ have not protected against death from Covid-19 or other causes

Our analysis of the Semenzato study has been published

On 4 December 2025, a sigh of relief swept through the press: a large French study had allegedly shown that people who had been vaccinated against Covid-19 were less likely to die from Covid-19, as well as from other illnesses [1]. The data came from the French national health service and covered more than 22 million vaccinated people and almost 6 million unvaccinated people. According to the authors, the vaccinated had a 74 percent reduced risk of dying from Covid-19 and a 25 percent reduced risk of dying from all possible causes (‘all-cause mortality’). The authors had statistically controlled for all possible confounding factors. Everything seemed to be going swimmingly. The mainstream press cheered. Politicians breathed a sigh of relief. Lauterbach, former German Minister for Health, triumphed.

I was skeptical, took a closer look at the publication, and saw what I had suspected: several groups had been excluded from the analysis – those who were vaccinated early on, people in poorer health, and so on. This is permissible, provided it is defined in advance in an analysis protocol. I wrote to the senior author, Prof. Mahmoud Zureik, and asked for the analysis protocol, which, strangely enough, was not mentioned or linked to anywhere. I also asked the obvious question: whether this selection had been defined in advance. I received no reply.

Read more

MWGFD e.V. calls for clarity on the authorization of COVID-19 mRNA and vector vaccines

by

MWGFD e.V. calls on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide clarity on the authorization documents for the modRNA and vector vaccines against COVID-19

An annotated bibliography on the issue of side effects of COVID-19 vaccines

As chairman of the association “Doctors and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy – MWGFD e.V.”, I recently wrote a letter to the head of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Ms Emer Cooke. The letter is published on the MWGFD website in its original English version and in a German translation. I am also making the original version available here as a PDF for download. Ms Cooke claimed that she had no evidence that would cast doubt on the safety of the COVID-19 modRNA vaccines. Really? We thought we’d give Ms Cooke a hand with a bit of literature, as she apparently doesn’t have a proper scientific department to do the work. Therefore, a – not exhaustive, but detailed – annotated bibliography is attached as an appendix to the letter.

A few words on the background:

Read more

Rabid Fact Foxes

by

The press is increasingly ceasing to be the ‘fourth estate’ and is instead becoming a court reporter, thereby acting as the gravedigger of democracy

In many of my blogs during the coronavirus pandemic, I have repeatedly asked, “Where are the investigative journalists?” “Where is the critical press?” With a few exceptions, I have noticed little critical reporting on official coronavirus policy, the ‘measures’, the state’s desire to force vaccinations on everyone, and related topics. The press has almost always sung from the same hymn sheet as the official statements from the government and its health related agencies. In my interview study, which I have so far only analysed in my coronavirus novel “Verschachtelte Wahrheit”, I also asked several media professionals why this is the case. The answers were complex, but one key element runs through them all:

The mental filter. There may well have been official directives from above at times, telling the editorial staff which way to go. But far more important is the “perceived truth”, what most people see as the “right” thing, what is politically correct, what people need to be taught. It is no longer what is actually the case that counts, but rather that one displays the correct attitude. And the correct stance is that of those perceived as progressive, liberal, left-wing—in short, the majority—and, coincidentally, it is also the stance of those in power. If you fail to toe this majority line, as a normal reporter or editor you run the risk of no longer being taken seriously, of no longer getting assignments, and perhaps even of losing your contract. The precarious world of short-term contracts and freelance work, which can be terminated at any time, has, according to my informants, largely replaced the once more common positions of editors and chief reporters who could not easily be sacked and were therefore steadfast in their views.

Read more

Book review Helmut Sterz: The Vaccination Mafia

by

I have read Helmut Sterz’s new book and will discuss it briefly here. It will be published on 1 December and is the most important book on coronavirus awareness that I am aware of (though I haven’t read them all). I highly recommend it to the readers of my blog. The book is only available in German, but I still want to convey the most essential aspects with my discussion for my English language readers.

Helmut Sterz: Die Impf-Mafia (The Vaccine Mafia). Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist proves how toxic substances were illegally sold to us as a cure for Covid-19. Basel: Rubikon. 240 pages. £24, ISBN 978-3-907606-00-1

The most significant part of this book on the coronavirus comes at the very end, on pages 206–210: ‘Demands for the investigation of the global pharmaceutical scandal’. There, the author makes 18 demands. In my opinion, the following are particularly noteworthy (in my own words – where not indicated by quotations, which are literal translations from the book):

Read more

Scientific publication on the mismanagement of the COVID-19 crisis

by

The global, collective mismanagement of the COVID-19 crisis has now been clearly outlined and published in a scientific journal

Quinn, G. A., Connolly, R., ÓhAiseadha, C., Hynds, P., Bagus, P., Brown, R. B., . . . Walach, H. (2025). What Lessons can Be Learned from the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic? International Journal of Public Health, 70, 1607727. doi:10.3389/ijph.2025.1607727; https://www.ssph-journal.org/journals/international-journal-of-public-health/articles/10.3389/ijph.2025.1607727/full

I have worked with 36 other authors on a detailed policy paper on the international collective mismanagement of the COVID-19 crisis, which has now been published and is available to the general public via the link above.

Some of these authors are well known, such as Robert Malone, Harvey Risch, Jessica Rose and Norman Fenton, while others have been less active in the public eye than in academia, such as Gerry Quinn, the lead author and organizer of the consortium, and others. One of the authors, Yaffa Shir-Raz from Haifa, has just published, together with others, a detailed critique of the claim that COVID-19 ‘vaccinations’ have saved millions of lives (Preprint; see also).

What they all have in common is that during the COVID-19 crisis, they argued extensively and with good scientific documentation that one or more aspects of the response to the crisis were not sufficiently scientifically sound or were even harmful. Whether it was masks, mandatory vaccination, social distancing rules, ‘vaccinations’ or other non-pharmaceutical measures (‘lockdown’).

Read more